Book Evaluation Checklist (can also be used for periodicals) Before using information from a book or periodical, it is important to critically evaluate the source according to the criteria listed below.
Determine the book's purpose.
Is the book written objectively (presenting all sides of an argument) or with a subjective bias (presenting the author’s own opinions/views)?
Why is the author making the argument? Is the author aiming for personal gain or to inform, present opinions, or report research?
Who is the intended audience?
Identify the author’s credentials.
Can you identify the author’s credentials?
Does the author teach at a university or have a degree in the area he/she is talking about?
Has the author published other (well-received) works?
Does the author work for an organization possibly connected with the issues that the author is writing about?
Identify the publisher.
What do you know about the publisher? The book publisher may reveal clues as to the reliability and/or bias of the information presented.
Does the publisher have a reputation for publishing quality materials?
Is the book published by an academic institution, large commercial publisher, non-profit organization, small or large business, or alternative-press publisher?
To locate materials about publishers, look at their websites. Find out what other books they have published and read about their editorial policies.
Consider the authority and sources of the book.
Does the book present documented facts or personal opinions?
Can you determine where/how the author gathered his information: i.e. are there footnotes, bibliographies, or lists of references? Is the book well documented?
Are those sources from original research, interviews, books or scientific journals? Are they primary or secondary references?
Check the timeliness of the book.
When was the material published? Is it outdated?
Does your research demand a recent book that discusses current research or issues or an older book that discusses the research and issues of a particular historical period?
Consider the type of information contained in the book.
Is the information scholarly, popular, governmental or corporate?
How does the book compare to information you've read in other books and articles? Does is offer multiple positions of your topic?
Does the information really support your research needs?
What aspect of your topic does the book not cover?
Can you use the bibliography or list of works cited to find more information on your topic?